We Should Never Settle on What 'Game of the Year' Signifies

The difficulty of finding new games remains the video game industry's most significant existential threat. Despite worrisome age of business acquisitions, growing profit expectations, labor perils, extensive implementation of artificial intelligence, platform turmoil, changing player interests, salvation often returns to the elusive quality of "breaking through."

Which is why I'm increasingly focused in "accolades" like never before.

With only some weeks left in the calendar, we're completely in Game of the Year time, an era where the small percentage of players who aren't playing identical multiple F2P shooters every week play through their library, debate development quality, and realize that even they won't get all releases. Expect comprehensive best-of lists, and there will be "you overlooked!" comments to these rankings. A player consensus-ish selected by press, influencers, and followers will be issued at The Game Awards. (Developers weigh in the following year at the interactive achievements ceremony and Game Developers Conference honors.)

All that celebration serves as entertainment — no such thing as accurate or inaccurate answers when naming the best releases of 2025 — but the importance appear greater. Each choice cast for a "game of the year", be it for the prestigious top honor or "Top Puzzle Title" in forum-voted honors, opens a door for wider discovery. A mid-sized game that went unnoticed at debut could suddenly attract attention by rubbing shoulders with better known (specifically heavily marketed) big boys. Once last year's Neva appeared in consideration for a Game Award, It's certain without doubt that tons of players immediately wanted to read a review of Neva.

Historically, recognition systems has made limited space for the diversity of releases released annually. The hurdle to overcome to evaluate all seems like an impossible task; approximately eighteen thousand games were released on Steam in the previous year, while only seventy-four releases — including new releases and live service titles to smartphone and VR specialized games — appeared across The Game Awards finalists. When mainstream appeal, discourse, and platform discoverability drive what people choose every year, it's completely impossible for the scaffolding of accolades to adequately recognize a year's worth of releases. Still, potential exists for enhancement, assuming we recognize its significance.

The Familiar Pattern of Industry Recognition

Recently, prominent gaming honors, among interactive entertainment's most established honor shows, announced its finalists. While the vote for top honor itself happens soon, you can already see the direction: The current selections created space for appropriate nominees — major releases that garnered recognition for quality and scope, hit indies received with major-studio attention — but in numerous of award types, exists a obvious predominance of recurring games. In the vast sea of art and play styles, top artistic recognition creates space for two different open-world games located in ancient Japan: Ghost of Yōtei and Assassin's Creed Shadows.

"If I was designing a next year's GOTY in a lab," a journalist commented in a social media post that I am amused by, "it would be a PlayStation open world RPG with mixed gameplay mechanics, companion relationships, and RNG-heavy roguelite progression that incorporates risk-reward systems and features light city sim base building."

Industry recognition, across organized and unofficial versions, has become expected. Several cycles of nominees and honorees has created a template for what type of refined 30-plus-hour experience can achieve a Game of the Year nominee. We see titles that never achieve top honors or even "significant" creative honors like Game Direction or Story, typically due to creative approaches and unusual systems. Most games launched in a year are destined to be limited into specific classifications.

Specific Examples

Imagine: Will Sonic Racing: Crossworlds, a game with a Metacritic score only slightly less than Death Stranding 2 and Ghosts of Yōtei, achieve highest rankings of annual GOTY category? Or maybe a nomination for best soundtrack (because the audio is exceptional and warrants honor)? Unlikely. Excellent Driving Experience? Absolutely.

How exceptional should Street Fighter 6 have to be to achieve GOTY recognition? Might selectors evaluate distinct acting in Baby Steps, The Alters, or The Drifter and acknowledge the best voice work of 2025 without AAA production values? Can Despelote's brief play time have "adequate" plot to warrant a (justified) Excellent Writing recognition? (Also, should annual event benefit from Top Documentary classification?)

Repetition in preferences across recent cycles — among journalists, on the fan level — demonstrates a method more biased toward a particular time-consuming game type, or independent games that generated sufficient attention to check the box. Not great for an industry where exploration is everything.

{